The Gasworks, Dublin.
- This topic has 39 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
August 3, 2007 at 1:55 am #709518MorlanParticipant
Couldn’t find a dedicated thread for The Gasworks, Paul. If one exists, please merge. 🙂
Anywho, I visited the Gasworks Complex today. I’ve passed it on the DART hundreds of times but never actually visited the place.
View from the DART line
The complex itself looks very well with great attention to detail. But it’s a depressing, lifeless place, like most of the docklands. Families don’t live here, only young professionals.
The Grand Entrance:
The inner courtyard is very pleasant The tree is strung with white fairy lights at Christmas.
You must admit, it was a fantastic idea to convert this into a building. It’s one of the best pieces of architecture in Dublin IMO.
-
August 3, 2007 at 8:46 am #790831AnonymousInactive
Great building but can’t see the appeal of living there. The balconies all face inside and none get any sun. Anybody mad enough to sit out can be watcehd from every other apartment.
As for the apartment blocks outside it, you can choose to live in the Dickens, the Clayburn or the Bligh. (give me a bucket!)
-
August 3, 2007 at 1:08 pm #790832AnonymousInactive
Fair enough, Bligh, at least, has an Irish connection..but the others? Is there no control over names of developments in Dublin by anybody?
-
August 3, 2007 at 1:14 pm #790833AnonymousInactive
I’ve only ever seen in in the distance from Lansdowne Rd. I never realised how big it is. I love it!
As for lack of families.. lack of quality outdoor space… just like pretty much every other apartment building in Ireland then!
-
August 4, 2007 at 2:19 pm #790834AnonymousInactive
Just to clarify, there is actually a few families living in the Gasworks, but as you say, it is mainly young professionals. I think the Irish Times did a piece on it about a year ago or so. I will see if I can find it. What I find most interesting about it is that the apartments in the old Gasometer all seem unoccupied, whilst the rest of the blocks seem to to be almost 90% full. Anyone have any ideas as to why? Has it turned out that whilst a good idea in principle to keep the structure, the apartments themselves don’t work given the constraints of the original structure? I am just speculating here, anyone know what the situation actually is? ie, is it that they simply aren’t finished? I remember that it was definitely being worked on after the others were finished, but that was well over a year ago now.
-
August 4, 2007 at 4:52 pm #790835AnonymousInactive
Phil, the place was empty when I went in. I was there for half an hour and nodoby came into the courtyard, except for one guy who walked in and said “hmmm” and walked out again!
There was a new fire door and several sheets of double glazing sitting outside the entrance, so maybe they’re still working on it.
-
August 4, 2007 at 4:53 pm #790836AnonymousInactive
Yeah, sounds like that must be the case. Strange none-the-less, isn’t it?
Incidently, nice photos as always. do you mind me asking what type of camera you use?
-
August 4, 2007 at 5:10 pm #790837AnonymousInactive
Cool pictures morlan
-
August 4, 2007 at 5:32 pm #790838AnonymousInactive
It’s an opportunity for the city that was wasted in my opinion. To have this turned into nothing more than an apartment complex is both money-grabbing and unimaginative. It should have been a public building of some sort.
-
August 4, 2007 at 5:35 pm #790839AnonymousInactive
Great stuff Morlan – polarising mania :p
I was always under the impression that the courtyard was glazed over, so these pics are something of a revelation. Yes I can’t see the balconies being overly desirable for use – even the acoustics would be off-putting I imagine. The upper ones would be nicer though with direct sunlight.
Interesting to see how the whole complex is built too, with thin concrete piers the depth of each apartment aligning with the columns of the outside structure. From the views above, it seems the apartments aren’t even furnished, so it mustn’t be finished yet.
-
August 4, 2007 at 7:08 pm #790840AnonymousInactive
@phil wrote:
Incidently, nice photos as always. do you mind me asking what type of camera you use?
Thanks Phil. 🙂
This is what I used for these shots:
– Canon 400D
– Sigma 10-20mm Wide-angle
– Circular polarising filterThe camera body isn’t important really – It’s the glass and filters that make a good photo. The camera body is about €600, and the glass/filters amounted to €800. You won’t be disappointed with the Sigma lens.
A circular polarising filter is essential for architectural photography as it cancels out any glare or reflection on glass/shiny surfaces.
@ake wrote:
Cool pictures morlan
Thanks ake!
@GrahamH wrote:
From the views above, it seems the apartments aren’t even furnished, so it mustn’t be finished yet.
Certainly seemed that way, Graham. Absolutely no sign of life, In fact, the whole Gasworks complex is windswept and lifeless.
-
August 5, 2007 at 9:58 am #790841AnonymousInactive
Is there a similar project anywhere else? UK maybe?
Are there definitely no health problems from toxic ‘stuff’ from when the gas was there? -
August 5, 2007 at 11:50 am #790842AnonymousInactive
There’s something similar in Vienna from about six years ago, I remember seeing it here in Italy on TV. I’ll go check,
-
August 5, 2007 at 11:53 am #790843AnonymousInactive
-
August 5, 2007 at 12:36 pm #790844AnonymousInactive
@Morlan wrote:
This is what I used for these shots:
– Canon 400D
– Sigma 10-20mm Wide-angle
– Circular polarising filterThanks for that Morlan.
-
August 5, 2007 at 3:39 pm #790845AnonymousInactive
@lunasa wrote:
Yup, here’s the link:
Enjoy.
They did a beautiful job on the ones in Vienna I think.
I like the mixture of public and private spaces. I especially like the gardens.I may take a weekend trip to Vienna to go see them.
-
August 5, 2007 at 8:56 pm #790846AnonymousInactive
MVRDV did something similar in Copenhagen, except they built their apartments around two old grain silos
http://www.archined.nl/oem/reportages/mvrdvSilo/siloMVRDV-eng.html
-
August 9, 2007 at 3:23 pm #790847AnonymousInactive
@newgrange wrote:
Are there definitely no health problems from toxic ‘stuff’ from when the gas was there?
Depends on who you ask.
The decontamination cost of this land was so great that it nearly halved the land’s value when Bord Gais sold it over to the DDDA back in ’98. Between the site of the Alliance gasometer (the metal red frame converted over into apartments) and the former gasholder site on Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, you had any number of these tasties fortifying the soil: arsenic, cyanides, sulpur, pheonols, tars, aromatic hydrocarbons, and mineral oils. Yum! An Bord Pleanala rejected the original Zoe Development plan to build on the Barrow St site until they came up with a thorough environmental impact statement that would ensure the decontamination would be carried out properly. Turns out that the first ‘thorough decontamination’ of a separate gasworks site involved them digging out to a depth of 8 feet, while toxins were floating around at about 20 feet below. As far as I know, they kept their word on this one.
I love what they’ve done with the apartments in the gasworks frame. I’d live there in a heartbeat. As long as they don’t gate it, rig it with attack dogs, or close off the courtyard, I think it’s great that it exists as a very approachable structure. It’s not public space in the truest sense of the word, but a better public space than one might imagine.
If you want wasted opportunity, just look at Stack A. Or has something wonderful and innovative happened there while I was busy breathing in. . . mmm. . . aromatic hydrocarbons?
-
August 9, 2007 at 5:16 pm #790848AnonymousInactive
manifesta, I thought the DDDA had handled the decontamination. Seems like I’m wrong there.
-
August 10, 2007 at 3:47 am #790849AnonymousInactive
I don’t know who actually shoveled the muck, but the onus was on Zoe to provide proof that the site would be ‘remediated’ properly after the Green Party and ABP raised concerns about the contaminated soil. The consultant engineers on the proposal were Ove Arup and Partners, at least as late as 2000. Again, who did the dirty work beyond that, I can’t be certain.
-
August 17, 2007 at 12:07 am #790850AnonymousInactive
Wow. I think the gasworks site is fantastic! It’s perhaps one of the best examples of urban redevelopment I’ve ever seen. The Courtyard looks absolutely Superb. The contractor/architect behind this development should be assigned to more developments all over the country. Great Stuff!
-
August 17, 2007 at 12:21 am #790851AnonymousInactive
Architects were O’Mahony Pike. They’re not messers.
-
May 19, 2008 at 1:52 pm #790852AnonymousInactive
so apparently there was somebody on liveline today giving out about the fact that he bought an apartment here but now the empty ones are being let out to DIT students for 150 a week…
-
May 19, 2008 at 2:06 pm #790853AnonymousInactive
@lostexpectation wrote:
so apparently there was somebody on liveline today giving out about the fact that he bought an apartment here but now the empty ones are being let out to DIT students for 150 a week…
Shocking – vacant apartments in Dublin being rented out – how bizarre
Did the caller just have a problem with students or something
-
May 19, 2008 at 2:10 pm #790854AnonymousInactive
150 a week each for 2 people sharing a twin room, with 2 rooms in each apartment.
over on thepropertypin they reckon it’s so he can write it off as a section 23 job.
-
May 19, 2008 at 3:57 pm #790855AnonymousInactive
that rent is e2,400 a month, significantly more than the ones in the rest of the development. Students getting screwed by landlords, it could never happen 🙂
-
May 19, 2008 at 4:26 pm #790856AnonymousInactive
so like 4 people to an apartment?
-
May 19, 2008 at 4:26 pm #790857AnonymousInactive
Well that’s a bit clearer – if they pay that much they deserve to be screwed over
-
May 19, 2008 at 5:44 pm #790858AnonymousInactive
I doubt anyone will pay that much to be honest, there’s some sort of scam going on here.
Maybe it’s to get back at those who objected to the Hotel plan?Reference for the rental prices I quoted earlier:
http://www.chubbproperties.com/gasworks.htmOTE: All inclusive rate – no additional charges
Free internet access
Free heat & electricity
TV & Cable
Washing machine / Dryer
Dishwasher
Microwave Oven
Kettle & Toaster
On site Office during office hours
Concierge for after hours
Internet, heat, electricity, TV, bins and all taxes are included in rate.Rates from September 2008:
Euro €150 per person per week (Inclusive of above)
A small number of single rooms are available at Euro €190 per week (Inclusive of above)
Some 1 bedroom apartments available -
May 19, 2008 at 6:08 pm #790859AnonymousInactive
Maybe it’s to get back at those who objected to the Hotel plan?
lol
-
May 20, 2008 at 8:11 am #790860AnonymousInactive
Wilkinson Eyre have a similar, larger scale gasometer, residential proposal in London:
-
May 20, 2008 at 8:22 am #790861AnonymousInactive
Could something like what MVRDV did on that silo in Copenhagen be applied to the Bolands Mill structure? Dotting cantilevered glass box embellishments to the outside of the building and maintaining the impressive mass of the concrete structure
-
May 20, 2008 at 9:07 am #790862AnonymousInactive
Here’s the Wilkinson Eyre one (stupid Flash websites – so beloved of architecture firms – that don’t allow linking):
-
May 20, 2008 at 11:48 am #790863AnonymousInactive
PTB posted images of the Copenhagen project on the previous page.
Cheers ctesiphon. How do you get around the Flash to copy and paste?
-
May 20, 2008 at 12:02 pm #790864AnonymousInactive
um… so are the apartments rented out in the gasometer or in the general development?
if it’s the gasometer – LOL! hate to be someone who purchased in one of the more mundane buildings to have students looking down on them 😉
-
May 20, 2008 at 12:28 pm #790865AnonymousInactive
@d_d_dallas wrote:
um… so are the apartments rented out in the gasometer or in the general development?
if it’s the gasometer – LOL! hate to be someone who purchased in one of the more mundane buildings to have students looking down on them 😉
Good question. AFAIK the apartments are in the gasometer only, and I heard that anyone who had a deposit down was being refunded. I dread to think of a Sat night/Sunday morning with various revellers shouting down at various parties on internal balconies!
Maybe it’s just a plot to get the students to frighten those with signed contracts into accepting a refund??:eek: -
May 20, 2008 at 4:10 pm #790866AnonymousInactive
@Landarch wrote:
Cheers ctesiphon. How do you get around the Flash to copy and paste?
Print screen, copy image into e.g. Paint, trim to remove traces of my identity (;)), save to image website (Photobucket, ImageShack, Flickr, etc.) and link to that image. Not exactly user-friendly, but Flash websites bring out the stubborn git in me. 😀
-
May 20, 2008 at 4:22 pm #790867AnonymousInactive
@KerryBog2 wrote:
Maybe it’s just a plot to get the students to frighten those with signed contracts into accepting a refund??:eek:
They were refunded years ago. Carroll owns all of the apartments in the gasometer itself
-
May 21, 2008 at 9:53 am #790868AnonymousInactive
This is such a Trojan Horse to get people to drop objections to the hotel.
I.e. give us our hotel or we give you students
-
June 9, 2008 at 8:34 am #790869
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.